<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laughlab: announcing the &#8216;world&#8217;s funniest joke&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sarahangliss.com/sonicart/laughlab/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sarahangliss.com/sounds/laughlab</link>
	<description>Words, sounds and robots from Sarah Angliss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:16:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allan Chapple</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahangliss.com/sounds/laughlab#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Chapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacedog.biz/?p=353#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Your theories of how humour works or why things are funny are amusing but inaccurate.

All humour is based on confrontation - with the &#039;barb&#039; taken out or the edge slightly blunted. Describe any situation that is potentially dangerous or embarrassing and you have a subject for humour.
This explains why humour changes because of culture, age, sex and intelligence, and why the difference between a cold or uproarious response are often so close. The more confronting the joke the greater the potential reaction. That&#039;s why if you get the giggles at a funeral or other important event it is going to be harder to control.
It also encapsulates your theories but explains why incongruity is funnier if it involves greater embarrassment. I have a lot more evidence but not time at this moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your theories of how humour works or why things are funny are amusing but inaccurate.</p>
<p>All humour is based on confrontation &#8211; with the &#8216;barb&#8217; taken out or the edge slightly blunted. Describe any situation that is potentially dangerous or embarrassing and you have a subject for humour.<br />
This explains why humour changes because of culture, age, sex and intelligence, and why the difference between a cold or uproarious response are often so close. The more confronting the joke the greater the potential reaction. That&#8217;s why if you get the giggles at a funeral or other important event it is going to be harder to control.<br />
It also encapsulates your theories but explains why incongruity is funnier if it involves greater embarrassment. I have a lot more evidence but not time at this moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
